<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Introduction to generic programming with type parameters</title>
	<atom:link href="http://expressionflow.com/2009/10/23/introduction-to-type-parameters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://expressionflow.com/2009/10/23/introduction-to-type-parameters/</link>
	<description>LabVIEW and visual programming blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:11:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tomi Maila</title>
		<link>http://expressionflow.com/2009/10/23/introduction-to-type-parameters/comment-page-1/#comment-6959</link>
		<dc:creator>Tomi Maila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 09:07:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://expressionflow.com/?p=267#comment-6959</guid>
		<description>Templates in C++ and type parameters are both a way to do generic programming and in that sense similar. Templates in C++ are rather old form of generic programming. Modern statically typed languages use type parameters with much better static type checking features. In a sense it&#039;s a pity C++ is used for LabVIEW development as most of LabVIEW R&amp;D engineers gain no experience on modern languages. I think we should not use term templates in communication with NI. Nobody wants such decades old programming concepts as C++ templates and nobody should request templates. It is generic programming we want instead and type parameters is the way to do it in modern statically typed languages like LabVIEW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Templates in C++ and type parameters are both a way to do generic programming and in that sense similar. Templates in C++ are rather old form of generic programming. Modern statically typed languages use type parameters with much better static type checking features. In a sense it&#8217;s a pity C++ is used for LabVIEW development as most of LabVIEW R&#038;D engineers gain no experience on modern languages. I think we should not use term templates in communication with NI. Nobody wants such decades old programming concepts as C++ templates and nobody should request templates. It is generic programming we want instead and type parameters is the way to do it in modern statically typed languages like LabVIEW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2mzu</title>
		<link>http://expressionflow.com/2009/10/23/introduction-to-type-parameters/comment-page-1/#comment-6958</link>
		<dc:creator>2mzu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 07:27:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://expressionflow.com/?p=267#comment-6958</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it something like template keyword in C++? I remember a post on NI forum by somebody from NI R&amp;D team that they consider templates a low priority update for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it something like template keyword in C++? I remember a post on NI forum by somebody from NI R&amp;D team that they consider templates a low priority update for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

